Drawing for KRACKJACK

USPTO serial 78200735

KRACKJACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRACKJACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles A. Muserlian

Charles A. Muserlian Charles A. Muserlian, Inc.317 Bliss LaneValley Cottage, NY 10989UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003BiscuitsACTIVEDec 31, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 10, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance