USPTO serial 78201076
ABI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H3C 2R5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
Peter S. Sloane Leason Ellis LLP81 Main Street, Suite 503White Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, database management, tracking and accounting software for use in the field of warehousing and inventory systems in the pulp and paper industries, computer operating programs for use in the pulp and paper industries, namely, software used for tracking and monitoring production and inventories in the pulp and paper industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper, namely, recycled paper, craft paper, craft paper; free sheet paper, namely, off-set paper, tablets, envelopes; groundwood paper, namely, newsprint paper, newsprint; fine and speciality papers, namely, printing paper, writing paper, copy paper, computer forms, tablets and envelopes, computer printout paper, continuous form paper, parchment paper, bond paper, ledger paper, mimeo paper, duplicator paper, form bond paper, computer paper, cover and text paper, blank directory paper, padded paper, facsimile paper; coated paper, namely, publication paper, plastic coated copying paper, laminated paper, illustration paper, coated printing paper, graphic arts converting paper, insulated paper in sheets | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Lumber and reconstituted lumber; plywood; building materials, namely, hardwood boards, wood boards, particle boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, treatment of wood, pulp, and paper; paper, lumber and pulp mill working services; recycling services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ABI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |