USPTO serial 78201198
DECK-PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2955569Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DECK-PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PLYMOUTH, MN
Diversified Dynamics Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
Diversified Dynamics Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
Diversified Dynamics Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia I. Reding
Patricia I. Reding Faegre Baker Daniels LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402-3901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | PORTABLE HAND PUMPED SPRAYER FOR SPRAYING AND APPLYING CHEMICALS, NAMELY FERTILIZERS, HERBICIDES, PESTICIDES, STAINS AND SEALERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WAGNER SPRAY TECH CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Diversified Dynamics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Diversified Dynamics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Diversified Dynamics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named DECK-PRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 24, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |