USPTO serial 78201282
BLUE RIDGE FARMS FAMILY RECIPES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3019578Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLUE RIDGE FARMS FAMILY RECIPES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ALLENWOOD, NJ
ALLENWOOD, NJ
BROOKLYN, NY
Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn, NY
BRICK TOWN, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna L. Thompson
Donna L. Thompson Law Office of Donna L. Thompson469 Herbertsville RoadNew Jersey, NJ 08724UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fresh and frozen prepared meals, entrees, side dishes and salads consisting primarily of meat, poultry, fish, seafood and/or vegetables; cheese spreads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 030 | Fresh and frozen prepared meals, entrees, side dishes and salads consisting primarily of pasta and/or rice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRESH PREPARED FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FRESH PREPARED FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CHLOE FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Ridge Farms, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Ridge Farms, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Ridge Farms, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PJJ CONSULTING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BLUE RIDGE FARMS FAMILY RECIPES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |