Drawing for MEDIS

USPTO serial 78201298

MEDIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Mitchell Jones

J MITCHELL JONES MEDLEN & CARROLL, LLP101 HOWARD ST STE 350SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94105U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceuticals, namely, growth medium manufactured from a co-culture of bacteria and fungi, for human consumption as a dietary supplement; dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance