USPTO serial 78201314
VIDEOFLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEOFLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandip S. (Micky) Minhas, Esq.
SANDIP S (MICKY) MINHAS ESQ QUALCOMM INCORPORATED5775 MOREHOUSE DR PATENT & TRADEMARKSAN DIEGO CA U, SA 92121-1714,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Audio-visual production services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |