USPTO serial 78201513
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated toilet preparations, namely, anti-perspirants, body wash, bubble bath, bath crystals, body mask, body scrub, shower gel, exfoliating body wash, breath fresheners, tooth gels, toothpaste, tooth polish and tooth powders, mouthwash, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion; cosmetic preparations, namely, blusher, foundation, body creams; body powder, cold cream, face powder, make-up, eye colour, mascara, eye liner, lip colour, skin moisturizer, hand cream, foot care preparations, namely, exfoliants for feet and non-medicated foot cream; nail grooming products, namely, nail polish, nail cream, and nail varnish removers; skin care products, namely skin lotions, creams and gels, skin cleansers, skin toners, and face masks; skin soaps, deodorants for personal use; non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, wax, gel, hairspray, mousse | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |