Drawing for NO7 DAILY VIE

USPTO serial 78201513

NO7 DAILY VIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO7 DAILY VIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toilet preparations, namely, anti-perspirants, body wash, bubble bath, bath crystals, body mask, body scrub, shower gel, exfoliating body wash, breath fresheners, tooth gels, toothpaste, tooth polish and tooth powders, mouthwash, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion; cosmetic preparations, namely, blusher, foundation, body creams; body powder, cold cream, face powder, make-up, eye colour, mascara, eye liner, lip colour, skin moisturizer, hand cream, foot care preparations, namely, exfoliants for feet and non-medicated foot cream; nail grooming products, namely, nail polish, nail cream, and nail varnish removers; skin care products, namely skin lotions, creams and gels, skin cleansers, skin toners, and face masks; skin soaps, deodorants for personal use; non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, wax, gel, hairspray, mousseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 6, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 1, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance