USPTO serial 78201536
ATUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3241226Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2007
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ATUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Eisen
MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO LLP20 QUEEN ST WEST STE 3202 BOX 102TORONTO, ON M5H 3R3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, operating software, search software and security software for use by application service providers and Internet service providers in network applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Application service provider services featuring software in the field of web hosting and design, computer networking and security, and electronic data interchange; computer software design for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by eCOM Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by eCOM Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by eCOM Development Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ATUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 15, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |