USPTO serial 78201570
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CURTIS H. CASTLEMAN
CURTIS H CASTLEMAN MAIL STOP 10-A3THE GATES CORPORATION1551 WEWATTA STDENVER, CO 80202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TRANSMISSION BELTS FOR LAND VEHICLE ENGINES; TIMING BELTS FOR ENGINES FOR LAND VEHICLES; POWER TRANSMISSION BELTS FOR MACHINES, MOTORS AND ENGINES; AND TIMING BELTS FOR MACHINES, MOTORS AND ENGINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | NON-METAL HOSES MADE PRIMARILY OF RUBBERY MATERIAL FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL MOTORS, ENGINES AND LAND VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |