USPTO serial 78201632
A LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
09122 Cagliari, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ARTICLES OF CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, DRESSES, SUITS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, COATS, TROUSERS, SHORT TROUSERS, PANTS, VESTS, JERSEYS, PAJAMAS,SOCKS AND STOCKINGS, SINGLETS, CORSETS, ANKLE GARTERS, GARTER BELTS, UNDERPANTS, PETTICOATS, HATS, HEAD-SCARVES, NECKTIES, RAINCOATS, GREATCOATS, BATHING SITS, SPORTS OVERALLS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, SKI PANTS, BELTS, FUR COATS, SCARVES, GLOVES, DRESSING GOWNS, FOOTWEAR, SHOES, SLIPPERS, BOOTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GYMNASTIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, BALLS AND BALLOONS, GOLF CLUBS, FISHING TACKLES, TENNIS BALLS, BADMINTON SHUTTLES COCKS, BILLIARD BALLS, BILLIARD CUES, ICE SKATES, HOCKEY STICKS, BALLS FOR VOLLEYBALL, FOOTBALL AND BASKETBALL, NETS FOR VOLLEYBALL, BASKETS AND BASKET RINGS FOR BASKETBALL, BACKBOARD SUPPORT FOR BASKETBALL, GOALS AND GOALPOST FOR FOOTBALL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RGTR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |