USPTO serial 78201786
LEVEL FIVE GIVING PYRAMID FOCUS MEASURE EFFECTIVENESS LEVERAGE GIFTS ASSETS EFFICIENT FUND DESIGN FAMILY ROLE PURPOSE - VALUES - PRIORITIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 2005
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LEVEL FIVE GIVING PYRAMID FOCUS MEASURE EFFECTIVENESS LEVERAGE GIFTS ASSETS EFFICIENT FUND DESIGN FAMILY ROLE PURPOSE - VALUES - PRIORITIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Level Five Giving Concepts, LLC
Little Rock, AR
Level Five Giving Concepts, LLC
Little Rock, AR
Level Five Giving Concepts, LLC
Little Rock, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES EDWARD HARRIS
JAMES EDWARD HARRIS REGIONS400 W CAPITOL AVELITTLE ROCK, AR 72201-3436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Estate, financial and tax planning services relating to a strategic approach to integrating charitable giving and philanthropy into a comprehensive estate and financial plan | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 7, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Level Five Giving Concepts, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Level Five Giving Concepts, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Level Five Giving Concepts, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named LEVEL FIVE GIVING PYRAMID FOCUS MEASURE EFFECTIVENESS LEVERAGE GIFTS ASSETS EFFICIENT FUND DESIGN FAMILY ROLE PURPOSE - VALUES - PRIORITIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |