Drawing for TORREMAYOR

USPTO serial 78201886

TORREMAYOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3473576Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 22, 2008
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with TORREMAYOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John N. Jennison

JOHN N. JENNISON JENNISON & SHULTZ, P.C.2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.SUITE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WINE, NAMELY, SPANISH WHITE AND RED WINE FROM RIBERA DEL GUADIANAACTIVEFeb 15, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2018RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 2, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 2, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 20, 2018E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2014NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 20148.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2014ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 17, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 23, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 19, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 29, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance