Drawing for CHIMULA

USPTO serial 78202011

CHIMULA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIMULA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHANIE KANN

DAVID A SEGAL GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP4 PARK PLZ JAMBOREE CTRIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028TOYS, NAMELY, CHILDREN'S ART ACTIVITY TOYS, DRAWING TOYS, PLASTIC CHARACTER TOYS, PLUSH TOYS, SKETCHING TOYS, TOY ANIMALS, TOY FIGURES, TOY MOBILES, TOY NOISEMAKERS, TOY STAMPS, TOY WATCHES, AND WIND SOCKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 3, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 16, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 14, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance