Drawing for COUCH YOGA

USPTO serial 78202221

COUCH YOGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COUCH YOGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin Hsia

Martin Hsia Cades Schutte a limited liability law partnership1000 Bishop Street12th floorHonolulu, HI 96813

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028YOGA PRODUCTS AND YOGA ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, YOGA MATS, YOGA STRAPS FOR STRETCHING, YOGA BAGS FITTED FOR CARRYING YOGA MATS, YOGA TOTE BAGS FITTED FOR CARRYING YOGA MATS, YOGA BRICKS, YOGA BLOCKS, YOGA BLANKETS, YOGA BOLSTERS, ZAFUS, YOGA WEDGES, YOGA BALLS AND PHYSIO BALLSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2005WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2005WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance