USPTO serial 78202662
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dusseldorf, DE
Dusseldorf, DE
Dusseldorf, DE
DUSSELDORF, US
27340-PONT DE L'ARCHE, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
Robert C. Faber Ostrolenk Faber LLP1180 Avenue of the Americas7th FloorNew York, NY 10036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical, optical, measuring and signaling apparatus, instruments and systems all for machining, cutting, milling, grinding, drilling beveling, grooving, polisher or cleaning of the edge and/or the optical surfaces of ophtalmic lenses made of glass or plastic, namely, lens edging, tracing and blocking machines; computerized scientific systems for use in connection with the aforesaid apparatus, instruments, namely, computer controlled lens edging, tracing and blocking machines; mechanical, optical, electrical and computerized lens decentering and blocking apparatus, namely, lens blocking meachines; block pads and block adapters being parts of optical apparatus and instruments, namely, blocking pads and adacpters for use in blocking machines; tension rings made of metal or plastic for use in connection with optical apparatus and instruments, namely, tension rings for use in lens edging, tracing and blocking machines; tracers and tracer machine systems, namely, computerized marchines for tracing the dimensions of a spectacle frame, a template or a pattern or an ophthalmic lens | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2007 |
| 009 | Computer software used to monitor and control the performance, operation, safety; quality and accuracy of lens edging, tracing and blocking machines in the optical supply field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |