USPTO serial 78202700
VIVID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NAKAGYO-KU KYOTO CITY, JP
NAKAGYO-KU KYOTO CITY, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FOURTEENTH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNDERWEAR AND PANTY HOSE; AND SOCKS, NAMELY KNEE-HIGH HOSIERY | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | HAIR ORNAMENTS, HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BERETS, CLIPS, BANDS, BOWS, BUCKLES, HAIR FROSTING CAPS, NON-ELECTRIC CURLERS, WAVING PINS, HAIR NETS, HAIR PIECES, HAIR PINS, RIBBONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |