USPTO serial 78202706
CLARUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3151483Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2006
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLARUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jeffersonville, IN
Jeffersonville, IN
Jeffersonville, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOT A. DUVALL
SCOT A DUVALL MIDDLETON REUTLINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning preparations, namely pearl cleaner, costume jewelry cleaner, gem cleaner, jewelry cleaner, silver cleaner; disposable jewelry wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 20, 2003 |
| 007 | cleaning machines which use vibrating motion to clean jewelry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 20, 2003 |
| 020 | jewelry organizers made of imitation leather; jewelry organizers made of plastic, namely, vinyl | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 20, 2003 |
| 021 | polishing cloths, namely jewelry care cloths, silver care cloths, fashion jewelry mitts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 20, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BMK Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by BMK Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by BMK Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CLARUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |