USPTO serial 78202747
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | INFANT FORMULAS; DIETETIC NUTRITIONALLY FORTIFIED FOODS FOR BABIES AND INFANTS; INFANT AND BABY FOODS, NAMELY, CEREALS, VEGETABLES, FRUITS, MEATS, FISH, EGGS, BISCUITS, FRUIT JUICES, VEGETABLE JUICES; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED VEGETABLES AND FRUIT; MEAT; POULTRY; GAME; FISH; SEAFOOD; SOUPS; JELLIES; PASTES, NAMELY, ANCHOVY, ARTICHOKE, FRUIT, GUAVA, LIVER, MEAT, TOMATO, VEGETABLE; PRESERVES; PREPARED OR PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; JAMS; EGGS; MILK; CHEESE; MILK SUBSTITUTES, NAMELY SOYA MILK; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; PROTEIN FOR USE AS A FOOD ADDITIVE | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE, COFFEE EXTRACTS AND COFFEE-BASED PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING NON-ALCOHOLIC, COFFEE-BASED BEVERAGES; COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; EXTRACTS USED AS FLAVORING, NAMELY, EXTRACTS OF COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; TEA, TEA EXTRACTS AND TEA-BASED BEVERAGES; COCOA AND COCOA-BASED BEVERAGES; CHOCOLATE; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, CANDY AND TOFFEES; SUGAR; NATURAL SWEETENERS; BAKERY GOODS; BREAD; YEAST; PASTRIES; BISCUITS; CAKES; BAKERY DESSERTS; PUDDINGS; ICE CREAM; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING ICE CREAM, NAMELY, SALTED AND SWEETENED POWDERED OR LIQUID MIXES, FOOD FLAVORING AND SUGAR; HONEY AND HONEY SUBSTITUTES; BREAKFAST CEREALS; RICE; PASTA; PREPARED OR PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RICE OR PASTA; SAUCES; SEASONINGS; SALAD DRESSINGS; MAYONNAISE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |