USPTO serial 78202813
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Christina Marie Lawson and Adam Albert Harrison Partnership, The
Las Vegas, NV
Other trademarks owned by Christina Marie Lawson and Adam Albert Harrison Partnership, The
Christina Marie Lawson and Adam Albert Harrison Partnership, The
Las Vegas, NV
Other trademarks owned by Christina Marie Lawson and Adam Albert Harrison Partnership, The
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Tanning Salon Services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |