Drawing for CITY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78203006

CITY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3115907Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2006
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CITY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $2,550

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter S. Sloane

Peter S. Sloane Leason Ellis LLPOne Barker Avenue, Fifth FloorWhite Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, weighing and measuring apparatus and instruments, namely gas detectors and sensors for the detection of oxygen, combustible and toxic gases; gas detectors and sensors for detecting and analyzing automotive emissions; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, sensors and monitors for detecting and measuring gases dispensed to patients for respiration or transpiration; sensors and monitors for detecting and measuring gases exhaled or transpired from patients; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely research, development and design of scientific, industrial safety, emissions, automotive and medical gas sensors, detectors and monitors; industrial analysis and research services in the field of scientific, industrial safety, emissions, automotive and medical gas sensors, detectors and monitors; development of new products for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 29, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 28, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 19, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 16, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 4, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 25, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance