USPTO serial 78203106
4VOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 4VOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care and makeup products namely after shaves, cleansers, scrubs, masks, moisturizers, under eye gels, serum treatments, foundations, concealers, correctors, powders; Cosmetics and toiletries: 1. Skin care products, namely pre-shave oils, shave creams, anti-bump repairs, toners, facial sprays, serums, shower gels, bath gels, body scrubs, body lotions, body treatments, body sprays, massage oils, hand sops, hand scrubs, hand lotions, cuticle removers, nail polish removers, nail treatments, foot scrubs, foot lotions, foot treatments, makeup removers, eye makeup removers, shampoos, conditioners, hair cleansers, hair styling sprays, hair styling gels, hair styling pomade, hair treatments, sunscreens, after-sun gels, sunless tans, lubricants, pleasure creams, deodorants, anti-prespirants, accessories 2. Makeup products, namely blushes, shadow bases, eye shadows, eyeliners, mascaras, brow brushes, lipsticks, lip glosses, lipliners, nail polishes, body glistens, lip accessories, brushes, accessories 3. Perfumes, colognes, eau de perfumes, eau de toilettes, toilet waters, essential oils, body fragrances; 1. Skin care and makeup products namely after shaves, cleansers, scrubs, masks, moisturizers, under eye gels, serum treatments, foundations, concealers, correctors, powders 2. Production and distribution (wholesale and retail) of the above products | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |