USPTO serial 78203182
I WISH THESE WERE BRAINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I WISH THESE WERE BRAINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF LIVE-ACTION, COMEDY, DRAMA AND/OR ANIMATED ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS; PRODUCTION OF LIVE-ACTION, COMEDY, DRAMA AND/OR ANIMATED TELEVISION PROGRAMS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF LIVE-ACTION, COMEDY, DRAMA AND/OR ANIMATED MOTION PICTURE THEATRICAL FILMS; PRODUCTION OF LIVE-ACTION, COMEDY, DRAMA AND/OR ANIMATED MOTION PICTURE THEATRICAL FILMS; LIVE THEATRICAL STAGE PERFORMANCES; AND PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |