Drawing for GOOD BOYZ MEAT TREATZ

USPTO serial 78203249

GOOD BOYZ MEAT TREATZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD BOYZ MEAT TREATZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jere M. Webb

JERE M WEBB STOEL RIVES LLP900 SW 5TH AVE STE 2600PORTLAND, OR 97204-1268UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031DOG FOOD; DOG SNACKS; DOG BISCUITS; DOG TREATSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 18, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance