USPTO serial 78203416
M40 TRANSYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3007763Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M40 TRANSYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alessandro Saracino
ALESSANDRO SARACINO PAVIA & HARCOURT LLP600 MADISON AVENEW YORK NY, 10022U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Disposable laboratory equipment for collecting diagnostic specimens consisting of a transport tube, a swab applicator stick with a fiber or foam tip, and/or a preserving medium | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 22, 2003 |
| 010 | Medical device for collecting diagnostic specimens consisting of a transport tube, a swab applicator stick with a fiber or foam tip, and/or a preserving medium | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 22, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Copan Innovations, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Copan Innovations, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Copan Innovations, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named M40 TRANSYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2006 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |