Drawing for GK

USPTO serial 78203473

GK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Titley

ROBERT L TITLEY QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE WI, 53202 4497U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely bib overalls, jumpers, shortalls, shorts, skirts, skorts, dresses, pants, bottoms, shirts, blouses, tops, tops with hoods, tank tops, sweaters, sweatshirts, outerwear, namely vests, coats, and jackets, swimwear, sleepwear, pajamas, footwear, namely boots, shoes, and sandals, hosiery, namely socks, tights, and leggings, underwear, layette, headwear, namely hats, caps, visors, and headbands, mittens and gloves, and suspenders all designed for childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 2, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 1, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 17, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance