Drawing for KRABBY PATTIES

USPTO serial 78203476

KRABBY PATTIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRABBY PATTIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lavatus Powell

LAVATUS POWELL C/O ANTHONY ORTIZ 1515 BROADWAY 51ST FLVIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS, AUDIO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS, VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROMS FOR USE IN FREESTANDING VIDEO GAME MACHINES; AND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, GAME CARTRIDGES FOR COMPUTER VIDEO GAMES AND VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS THEREWITH SOLD AS A UNIT, THEATRICAL OR MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; THEATRICAL AND MUSICAL VIDEO RECORDINGS, RECORDED LASER DISCS AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS/DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS; SUNGLASSES, CD STORAGE RACKS; CD STORAGE WALLETS, AND COIN SORTERSACTIVE—
014CLOCKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 22, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance