USPTO serial 78203478
ISO-VEYOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3218520Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ISO-VEYOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EAST KILBRIDE, GB
EAST KILBRIDE, GB
Glasgow, GB
Glasgow, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. Michael Sajovec
F. Michael Sajovec MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVEC PA4140 Parklake AvenueSuite 600RALEIGH, NC 27612Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INBULK TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INBULK TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Clyde Bowers Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Clyde Bowers Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ISO-VEYOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |