USPTO serial 78203579
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Lockhart
THOMAS L LOCKHART VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLP333 BRG ST NWGRAND RAPIDS MI, 49504U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTS, HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS, MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS, DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, FOOD SUPPLEMENTS IN BEVERAGE FORM, FOOD FOR INFANTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | BABY BOTTLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | DISPOSABLE DIAPERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT, MEAT, POULTRY, FROZEN PRE-PACKAGED DINNERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND VEGETABLES; FROZEN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; SOY, FRUIT AND POTATO BASED SNACK FOODS; SOUPS, DRIED FRUITS AND NUTS; DAIRY-BASED CHOCOLATE FOOD BEVERAGES, CHOCOLATE MILK; PROCESSED LEGUMES; VEGETABLE SALAD | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | SAUCES; RICE AND CORN SNACKS, CEREAL-BASED SNACKS, PRETZELS; CANDY, FROSTINGS; NON-DAIRY OR VEGETABLE BASED CHOCOLATE FOOD BEVERAGES, COFFEE AND COCOA-BASED BEVERAGES, BREAKFAST CEREAL, SALAD DRESSINGS, SPICES, NATURAL SWEETENERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | FRESH HERBS, FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, NAMELY CARROTS, ONIONS, GARLIC, PEPPERS, SQUASH AND FRESH LETTUCE; PRODUCE, NAMELY, FRESH TOMATOES, GREEN BEANS AND CUCUMBERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SOFT DRINKS; NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, WATER, WATER FLAVORED WITH FRUIT JUICE AND SODAS FLAVORED WITH FRUIT JUICE; SYRUPS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICE BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |