USPTO serial 78203721
VIRTUAL TRANSACTIONS TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRTUAL TRANSACTIONS TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Mark Holland
J MARK HOLLAND J. MARK HOLLAND & ASSOCIATES3 CIVIC PLZ STE 210NEWPORT BEACH CA, 92660U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for data communication and manipulation, namely, for receiving, transmitting, displaying, acquiring, storing, processing, and using data from automobile diagnostic ports, pool and spa equipment, and health monitoring equipment; computer cables and adaptors for data communication | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data and messages for data communication, retrieval, and manipulation, including for receiving, transmitting, displaying, acquiring, storing, processing, and using data from automobile diagnostic ports, pool and spa equipment, and health monitoring equipment; electronic transmission of data and messages for others for purposes of data acquisition for use in automobile maintenance and in trouble-shooting technical problems with automobiles; text and numeric wireless digital messaging services; facsimile transmission services and providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; cellular telephone services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | remote monitoring of automated diagnostic systems of others for use in automobile maintenance and trouble-shooting the technical performance and problems of automobiles, pool and spa equipment, and medical monitoring equipment; and monitoring the telecommunications systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; diagnostic services for maintenance and trouble-shooting of automobiles, pool and spa equipment, and medical monitoring equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |