Drawing for JADE EMPIRE

USPTO serial 78204264

JADE EMPIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JADE EMPIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

REBECCA L ROBY

JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP1601 MARKET STSTE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded motion picture and television films and shows featuring characters from a computer gameACTIVE—
016Paper goods, comic books, trading cards, pogs, coloring books, adhesive stickers, rub-on transfers, notebooks and stationery-type portfoliosACTIVE—
028Toys and games, namely, action figures and action figures accessoriesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, television shows and motion pictures based on a computer gameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 5, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance