USPTO serial 78204309
AF 65 CAFATEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AF 65 CAFATEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NGUYEN NHU HOANG LAN
THIEU NGUYEN5650 CHELMSFORD CTBURKE, VA 22015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed seafood, namely, frozen fish, canned fish; frozen shrimp, canned shrimp; frozen crab, canned crab; frozen cuttlefish, canned cuttlefish; frozen and canned poultry; meat extracts; agricultural produce, namely, canned fruit, preserved fruit, preserved vegetables, dried vegetables, cooked vegetables; jelly, jams; milk and milk products; oils and edible fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, rice, tapioca, flour and preparations made from cereals, bread and pastries. | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |