USPTO serial 78204502
WATSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye, Esquire
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE ESQ BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQ 9TH FLPHILADELPHIA PA, 19103U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN LABORATORY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, SOFTWARE USED IN ANALYZING, REPORTING, AND TRACKING PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG STUDY SAMPLE DATA FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 7, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |