USPTO serial 78204789
SERRIFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SERRIFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sanders
JESSICA STONE LEVY PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLPSTE 2900925 FOURTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Children's educational software; Communications software for connecting computer network users; Computer search engine software; Computer software development tools; Computer game software; Computer telephony software; Data compression software; Graphical user interface software; Industrial process control software; Video game software; Web site development software; Multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM for marketing, instruction or presentation; Computer screen saver software; Computer software for accessing information directories that may be downloaded from the global computer network; Computer utility programs; computer software for application and database integration | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer network design for others; Computer programming for others; Computer project management services; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for other; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer site design; Computer software consultation; Computer software design for others; Product development; Computer software development; Computer systems analysis; Repair of computer software; Integration of computer systems and networks; Computer code conversion for others; Installation of computer software; Software authoring; Data conversion of computer program data or information; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; maintenance of computer software; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |