Drawing for WILD MANGO CLOTHING

USPTO serial 78205068

WILD MANGO CLOTHING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WILD MANGO CLOTHING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER J. DAY

DORON CHANIN7525 ETHEL AVE.SUITE K/LNORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91605

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, JACKETS, SKIRTS, SHORTS, DRESSES, ROMPERS, JUMPSUITS AND PANTS FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDRENABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 17, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 17, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 17, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 26, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 3, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 27, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance