Drawing for DISCOVER THE POSSIBILITIES

USPTO serial 78205114

DISCOVER THE POSSIBILITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCOVER THE POSSIBILITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janis M. Manning, uire

JANIS M MANNING VERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INC600 HIDDEN RDG DRC/O CHRISTIAN R ANDERSEN MC HQE03H14IRVING, TX 75038

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Local hotel network services, namely, providing pay-per-view cable television transmission services and high-speed access to a global computer network via interactive television and via computerACTIVE—
041Local hotel network services, namely, entertainment in the nature of on-line gaming services, namely, providing computerized casino games via a global computer network that is interfaced by interactive televisionACTIVE—
042Local hotel network services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for guest room climate control and for obtaining information on local area attractions via a global computer network that is interfaced by interactive televisionACTIVE—
045Local hotel network services, namely, hotel concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs of hotel guestsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 27, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance