USPTO serial 78205233
ALLSTATE CAPITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLSTATE CAPITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Deerfield Beach, FL
Deerfield Beach, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Leasing of office equipment | ABANDONED | Mar 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M2 Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by M2 Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Merit Marketing Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Merit Marketing Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ALLSTATE CAPITAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |