USPTO serial 78205446
RUGGED ELEGANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3002542Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2005
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUGGED ELEGANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Series of dining, shopping, entertainment; travel and services guide books | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2003 |
| 035 | On-line retail services featuring maps, computer software, CDs, DVDs, books, relating to dining, shopping, entertainment, travel and services, by means of a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rugged Elegance, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Rugged Elegance, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Rugged Elegance, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named RUGGED ELEGANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |