USPTO serial 78205566
POWERMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWERMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Menomonee Falls, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Sheridan
JAMES A SHERIDAN PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO, PC470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM MA, 02451U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric machines for resistance welding, incondescent welding, spark welding and arc welding, parts and fittings and tools for such machines; electrodes for electric welding; electronic control equipment for thermal diffusion facilities; electronic soldering, cutting and welding machines; plasma spraying and plasma welding apparatus, flame spraying equipment; jets, tips and nose pipes for such machines; welding electrodes, consumable electrodes; torches and welding heads; thermal spray diffusers of all kind; feeders for wires and rods; turbine-driven auxiliaries for increasing energy in soldering, cutting and welding apparatus and feeders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |