USPTO serial 78205697
Serial No. 78205697
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GENOVESE, CARRIE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78205697?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MERIDEN, WARWICKSHIRE, GB
WORCHETERSHIRE, GB
Dorset, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Evans
J SCOTT EVANS ADAMS, SCHWARTZ & EVANS, PA301 S TRYON ST 2180 TWO WACHOVIA CECHARLOTTE NC, 28282U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, namely, lamps, lamp bases, ceramic lamp bases | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, wall and floor tiles, ceramic tiles, decorative wall and floor panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household and kitchen utensils and containers all of which are made of glass, porcelain, china, earthenware and/or ceramic, namely, jugs, egg cups, cake stands, pitchers, candy dishes, cruet sets, tea pots, beakers, drinking glasses, tumblers, decanters, spatulas, strainers, turners, whisks, rolling pins, food containers; dinnerware made of glass, porcelain, earthenware, china, and/or ceramics, namely, cups, saucers, plates, cream jugs, sugar bowls, soup tureens, sauce boats, salt and pepper pots, salt and pepper shakers, bowls, platters, butter dishes; ovenware, namely baking dishes and casserole dishes; figurines of glass, porcelain, china, earthenware and/or ceramic; ornamental articles made of glass, porcelain, china, earthenware and/or ceramic, namely, floral and fruit ornaments not including Christmas tree ornaments, decorative plates, decorative baskets, decorative jars, honey jars sold empty, ginger jars, napkin rings, coasters, decorative table center pieces, trays, candle holders, vases, plant containers, decorative boxes, trinket boxes, baskets and ring stands; pottery, namely, mugs, cups, saucers, plates, cream jugs, sugar bowls,soup tureens, sauce boats, cream jugs, salt and pepper pots, salt and pepper shakers, bowls, platters, butter dishes, figurines, vases, plant containers, trays, decorative plates; glass and ceramic mosaics not for buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POOLE POTTERY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OPALCOM LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Poole Pottery Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |