Drawing for DIGITAL SALES ORGANIZATION

USPTO serial 78206015

DIGITAL SALES ORGANIZATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL SALES ORGANIZATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline D'Angelo

JACQUELINE DANGELO SALU INC4160 DOUGLAS BLVDGRANITE BAY CA, 95746U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Corporate website advertising and marketing in the nature of online informational advertising directed to professionals in the healthcare and pharmaceutical fields; conducting business and market research surveys in the medical field; independent sales representatives in the area of medicine.ACTIVE—
042Computer services for others, namely the provision of on-line computer network website hosting services and the development of websites for physician specialists; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for creating and maintaining medical practice websites including the design of e-mail and medical messaging features; Designing and implementing websites for others, namely, developing corporate websites with links to the websites of pharmaceutical business partners.ACTIVE—
044Providing drug and health information to physician specialists via a website on a global computer network.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
May 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance