USPTO serial 78206104
HCX HAIRCOLORXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HCX HAIRCOLORXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FL. LAUDERDALE, FL
FL. LAUDERDALE, FL
haircolorxpress International, LLC
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Other trademarks owned by haircolorxpress International, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH C. WASCH
JOSEPH C WASCH VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL COUNSEL4850 W PROSPECT RDFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair color preparations, namely, hair dyes, hair bleaching preparations, hair color removers; non-medicated hair care styling preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, styling spray, gels, and hair spray; and non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, foundation, powder, blush, eye shadows, eye pencils, eye liners, mascara, lipsticks and lip gloss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HCXSALONS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HCXSALONS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by haircolorxpress International, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HCX HAIRCOLORXPERTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |