USPTO serial 78206219
PALISADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PALISADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY V. LUPO
ANTHONY V LUPO ARENT FOX PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotels; resort hotels; inns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |