Drawing for SMOOZE

USPTO serial 78206385

SMOOZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMOOZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine Q. McLeod

DEBORAH NORTON1019 MANIGAN AVEOVIEDO, FL 32765UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment and educational services, namely production of video, audio, and multimedia programs featuring animated cartoon characters, live entertainment with costumed characters; publication of books, stories, episodes, and scripts featuring animated cartoon charactersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 27, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jan 6, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jan 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance