USPTO serial 78206516
IDEACORE SUCCESS CENTERED TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDEACORE SUCCESS CENTERED TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Birmingham, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | "IDEACore" is the name of our company, which is a software development company; IDEACore is both a product and service company providing training, coaching and team facilitation, as well as "Computer Software" for use in business improvement best practices; The software can be downloaded from a global computer network; and computer search engine software for e-commerce, which can be downloaded from a global computer network | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 29, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |