Drawing for BIOREFINING

USPTO serial 78206550

BIOREFINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOREFINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janal M. Kalis

JANAL M KALIS SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG WOESSNER & KLUTH121 S 8TH ST1600 TCF TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF SPECIALITY CHEMICALS FOR OTHERS IN THE NATURE OF LARABINOSE, HEMICELLULOSE, PECTINS, PROTEINS, MONOSACCHARIDES, OLIGOSACCHARIDES, AND POLYSACCHARIDES USING PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE BASED REACTION KINETICSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 10, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 3, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 17, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance