USPTO serial 78206618
MICROBLEND TECHNOLOGIES MAKING PAINT BETTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2005
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROBLEND TECHNOLOGIES MAKING PAINT BETTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GILBERT, AZ
Alhambra, CA
Alhambra, CA
Alhambra, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert L. Schmeiser
Albert L. Schmeiser SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS18 EAST UNIVERSITY DRIVE, #101MESA, AZ 85201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | ARCHITECTURAL AND INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, NAMELY INTERIOR, EXTERIOR, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL FINISH PAINTS, PAINT PRIMERS AND WOOD STAINS; COMPONENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, NAMELY INTERIOR, EXTERIOR, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL FINISH PAINTS, PAINT PRIMERS AND WOOD STAINS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 10, 2003 |
| 007 | Computerized machine for formulating and dispensing paint, comprising, computer hardware and software for selecting a formulation of paint and controlling the mixing of paint components, containers of paint components, and dispensers, valves, hoses and pumps for dispensing paint components | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROBLEND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Smiland Paint Company
- Other trademarks owned by Smiland Paint Company
- Other trademarks owned by Smiland Paint Company
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MICROBLEND TECHNOLOGIES MAKING PAINT BETTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |