Drawing for MAKING WAVES

USPTO serial 78206822

MAKING WAVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKING WAVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. John Carson, Esq.

M JOHN CARSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP865 S FIGUEROA ST FL 29LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2543UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care products, namely hair gelACTIVEMar 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 28, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 26, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 26, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 26, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 25, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 5, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 14, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
May 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance