USPTO serial 78206822
MAKING WAVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKING WAVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. John Carson, Esq.
M JOHN CARSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP865 S FIGUEROA ST FL 29LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2543UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely hair gel | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |