USPTO serial 78207135
COBBLE COURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COBBLE COURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Litchfield, CT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | INTERIOR DECORATING SERVICES; INTERIOR DECORATING CONSULTATION SERVICES; RETAIL and E-COMMERCE STORE SERVICES AND MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING HOUSEWARES, GLASSWARE, TABLEWARE, FLATWARE, INDOOR AND OUTDOOR FURNITURE, PILLOWS, SLIPCOVERS, RUGS, LAMPS AND LIGHTING FIXTURES, CURTAINS, CURTAIN RODS, TABLE LINENS, BED LINENS, BATH OILS, SKIN CARE LOTIONS AND OILS, FRAGRANCE OILS, POTPOURRI, CANDLE HOLDERS, PICTURE FRAMES, MIRRORS, VASES, BASKETS MADE OF WICKER, INTERIOR DECORATING BOOKS, INTERIOR WALL AND FURNITURE PAINT, WALL COVERINGS, WINDOW COVERINGS, WINDOW SHADES, FABRIC, NAMELY, CURTAIN FABRIC, UPHOLSTERY FABRIC, FABRIC MADE OF COTTON, LINEN, SILK, POLYESTER, RAYON, AND FABRIC MADE OF GAUZE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |