Drawing for Serial No. 78207313

USPTO serial 78207313

Serial No. 78207313

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78207313?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Byron R. Jacobson

LISA A OSMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPSTE 4700370 SEVENTEENTH STDENVER, CO 80202-5647

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020window blinds and window shadesACTIVEApr 2, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 19, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 10, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance