USPTO serial 78207370
PROTECTION REDEFINED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTECTION REDEFINED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Okin Goldsmith, Esq.
SUSAN OKIN GOLDSMITH ESQ DUANE MORRIS LLP240 PRINCETON AVE STE 150HAMILTON, NJ 8619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Athletic protective pads for use in ice hockey, baseball, softball and lacrosse, namely shoulder pads, elbow pads, knee pads, body pads, side pads, hip pads, rib pads, neck rolls, and shin pads, and ice hockey goalie pads and elbow pads, knee pads, hip pads, neck rolls and shin pads for use in football | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Impact Protective Equipment, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Impact Protective Equipment, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PROTECTION REDEFINED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |